08172017Headline:

Tampa, Florida

HomeFloridaTampa

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-837: Remodeling Contractor’s “Out-of-Zone” Included Since Claimant Maintained No Facility

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-816:Paving Contractor Not Operating “Out-Of-Zone Facilities” From Which It Received Impermissible Revenue

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-797: Church’s “Revenue” and “Tax” Properly Classified By SP

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-790: Pre-Spill Operations Not Sufficient for “Start-Up” Vacation Property Lessor

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-754: Electrical Contractor Is Not a “Multi-Facility” Claimant

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-749: Grants to A Church Are Not “Revenue” That Need to be Reallocated Over The Period Covered By The Grant

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-741:Claimant’s Locations Satisfy the Definition of A “Facility”

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-705:Claimant Does Not Operate”Out of Zone” Facilities

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-705: Claimant Correctly Classified As “Construction” Instead of Real Estate Developer

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-676:SP Correctly Addressed Officer Compensation and Properly Treated Payroll Costs

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]