BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-2370: Manufacturer/Seller of Pipe Protection Products Financials “Presumptively Matched” Since None of Policy 495’s Seven Criteria Were Triggered
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-2278: Lawn Service Company’s Income from Government Contract Not 50% of Income
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Claim Discretionary Review of Appeal 2016-842: Gasoline Retailer Not Excluded–Appeal Panel REVERSED
The following is a Discretionary Review Order issued by Judge Barbier pursuant to the Rules Governing Discretionary Court Review of Appeal Determinations. Judge Barbier’s rulings are binding on the Claims Administrator and the Appeal Panelists. Links may have been added to […]
BP Claim Discretionary Review of Appeal 2016-1069: Non-Recurring Land Sale Which Were Assets of Claimant Properly Excluded Under Policies 328, 373 and Exhibit 4B
The following is a Discretionary Review Order issued by Judge Barbier pursuant to the Rules Governing Discretionary Court Review of Appeal Determinations. Judge Barbier’s rulings are binding on the Claims Administrator and the Appeal Panelists. Links may have been added to […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-2221:Claimant Not Precluded Under Oil and Gas Moratoria
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1971: “Incidental Relationship” To Oil and Gas Industry Insufficient for Exclusion
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1751:DOD Contractor Earned Less Than 50% Income From GOVT Contracts–Award Affirmed
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1714: Totality of Circumstances Do Not Support Client Is Real Estate Developer
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1220: Agriculture Methodology Appropriate for Farming Operation; Crop Insurance Proceeds and Dividends Property Excluded From Revenue
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1176: Neither Settlement Agreement Nor Policy 495 Excludes Defense Contractor/Subcontractor Which Earned Less Than 50% of Its Revenue From Defense Contracts
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
