BP Deepwater Horizon Claim Policy 495 Gutted by 5th Circuit
A few weeks ago the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ripped the heart out of Policy 495’s claimant-unfriendly “matching” methodology. Specifically, the Court held that certain specialized formulas, those used to “match” the “unmatched” profit and […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-809: Auto Auction Claimant’s Financials Sufficiently Matched–BP’s Argument is “Speculative”
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-797: Church’s “Revenue” and “Tax” Properly Classified By SP
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-773:Progran Accountant Properly Reallocated Construction Claimant’s Direct Job Costs and Owner/Officer/Employee Expenses
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-772: Professional Judgment of the Program Duly Exercised; Reallocation “Sufficiently Matched” Under Construction Methodology
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-768: SP Properly Adjusted Financials and Correctly Applied BEL, Not Construction, Methodology
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-766: Settlement Program Selected Correct Crop Dates For Claimant Farming Operation
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-749: Grants to A Church Are Not “Revenue” That Need to be Reallocated Over The Period Covered By The Grant
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-705: Claimant Correctly Classified As “Construction” Instead of Real Estate Developer
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2017-676:SP Correctly Addressed Officer Compensation and Properly Treated Payroll Costs
The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]
