03302017Headline:

Tampa, Florida

HomeFloridaTampa

Tom Young

BP Claim Discretionary Review of Appeal 2016-8: Between accrual and cash P&Ls, accrual will be utilized for claim calculation

The following is a Discretionary Review Order issued by Judge Barbier pursuant to the Rules Governing Discretionary Court Review of Appeal Determinations. Judge Barbier’s rulings are binding on the Claims Administrator and the Appeal Panelists. Links may have been added to […]

Tom Young

BP Claim Discretionary Review of Appeal 2015-1765: Correction of obvious mismatch of revenue and expenses affirmed

The following is a Discretionary Review Order issued by Judge Barbier pursuant to the Rules Governing Discretionary Court Review of Appeal Determinations. Judge Barbier’s rulings are binding on the Claims Administrator and the Appeal Panelists. Links may have been added to […]

Tom Young

BP Claim Discretionary Review of Appeal 2015-1694: Commercial lessor properly subjected to “step-one” matching

The following is a Discretionary Review Order issued by Judge Barbier pursuant to the Rules Governing Discretionary Court Review of Appeal Determinations. Judge Barbier’s rulings are binding on the Claims Administrator and the Appeal Panelists. Links may have been added to […]

Tom Young

BP Claim Discretionary Review of Appeal 2015-1696: “Step One” matching affirmed in equipment rental claim

The following is a Discretionary Review Order issued by Judge Barbier pursuant to the Rules Governing Discretionary Court Review of Appeal Determinations. Judge Barbier’s rulings are binding on the Claims Administrator and the Appeal Panelists. Links may have been added to […]

Tom Young

BP Claim Discretionary Review of Appeal 2015-1722: “Step One” Matching of Landlord’s Revenue Affirmed

The following is a Discretionary Review Order issued by Judge Barbier pursuant to the Rules Governing Discretionary Court Review of Appeal Determinations. Judge Barbier’s rulings are binding on the Claims Administrator and the Appeal Panelists. Links may have been added to […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-342: Vendors do not violate Policy 495 when they exercise their discretion in addressing a mismatch of revenue and expenses that can be explained and supported by documentation

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-311: Revenue reallocation permitted at the discretion of the vendor

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-310: Annual membership dues can be smoothed

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-274: No “step one” matching and smoothing requirement under Policy 495

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-267: Lessor’s revenue should not be moved (decision overruled)

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]