03302017Headline:

Tampa, Florida

HomeFloridaTampa

Tom Young

BP Claim Discretionary Review of Appeal 2016-842: Gasoline Retailer Not Excluded–Appeal Panel REVERSED

 The following is a Discretionary Review Order issued by Judge Barbier pursuant to the Rules Governing Discretionary Court Review of Appeal Determinations. Judge Barbier’s rulings are binding on the Claims Administrator and the Appeal Panelists. Links may have been added to […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1926: Construction Methodology Properly Applied to Motorcycle Manufacturer

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1913: Construction Methodology Instead of AVM Applied to Heating and A/C Contractor; Appeal Panelist Will Not Substitute His Judgment For That of SP

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1822: Professional Services Methodology Correctly Applied to Restate Financials of Zone D Law Firm

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1787: Movie Theater Location In Tourist “Mecca” Not Sufficient for Tourism Designation

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1784:AVM Methodology Applied To Engineering Firm Instead of Professional Services Methodology

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1782:AVM More Appropriate Than Construction Methodology for Fence Company; NAICS Code Note Determinative

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1761:AVM Methodology Is The Default Approach; Specialized Methodologies Used Only If Revenue Doesn’t Reflect “Economic Reality”

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1377:Mobile Home Dealer Denied Tourism Designation Since 60% of Its Sale Were “Local”

Claimant is a mobile home dealer with five separate locations in Alabama and Tennessee. This claim concerns Claimant’s Montgomery, Alabama location, which is located in Zone D. The Settlement Program denied this claim because Claimant is located in Zone D […]

Tom Young

BP Business Economic Loss Claim Appeal 2016-1352: Absence of Sales Data Negates Tourism Designation Despit Claimant’s Location in Tourist Area

The following is an Appeal Panel Decision issued pursuant to Section 6 of the BP Deepwater Horizon Economic & Property Damages Settlement Agreement and the Rules Governing the BP Appeals Process. Links may have been added to assist the reader. The original decision […]