05302017Headline:

Tampa, Florida

HomeFloridaTampa

Email Tom Young Tom Young on LinkedIn Tom Young on Twitter Tom Young on Facebook Tom Young on Avvo
Tom Young
Tom Young
Attorney • (813) 251-9706

BP Audit Exonerates Judge Barbier, BP Claims Administrator Juneau

3 comments

The third-party audit by Chicago-based McGladrey LLP comes after the finding last year by Former FBI Director and court-appointed Special Master Louis Freeh that Deepwater Horizon Claims Administrator Patrick Juneau “sets an ethical tone at the top” of the historic settlement payment program. Last week’s subsequent audit, insisted upon by BP, concludes that Mr. Juneau’s operation is “well-designed and appropriate,” paying accurate compensation over 99.5% of the time, an almost infinitesimally small error rate.

The results of the audit were clearly not what BP was hoping for. For more than a year the company has been searching in vain for “fraudulent filings” and other indicia of incompetence so that a scapegoat could be manufactured to divert attention away from BP’s own grossly negligent and criminal behavior. Alas, the evidence is clear that BP has manufactured this faux-crisis in an attempt to dissuade participation in the claims program and to pique the interest of the appellate courts, particularly the Supreme Court. The company has failed.

Judge Barbier, who approved the Settlement Agreement (which, by the way, BP authored, yet now disavows), has called BP’s actions in attacking Claims Administrator Juneau in his application of the Settlement’s causation standards “deeply disappointing” and “not inadvertent.” In short, BP has been playing fast and loose with the American judicial system. The Supreme Court should put an end to it.

3 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. Eyeswideopen says:
    up arrow

    Now it’s time to demand the PSC strike down Policy 495.
    The objective standards that the PSC and BP agreed to and paid claims prior to the Fairness Hearing should be enforced.

    The Audit confirms proper payments were being made.

    I can think of no reason why we should accept a subclass of claimants receiving a different payment structure.

  2. up arrow

    I think BP is trying to do what Exxon did. Wait a few years for the public to be less outraged, then chip away at the judgment, until the local economy, you (BP) destroyed receives little-to-nothing fro what they suffered. I really appreciate you keeping everyone up to date Tom!

Leave a Comment

Have an opinion? Please leave a comment using the box below.

For information on acceptable commenting practices, please visit Lifehacker's guide to weblog comments. Comments containing spam or profanity will be filtered or deleted.